May I Suggest a Perpetual Motion Machine?
Written by Marc Boland · February 16, 2006
Max Mosely isn’t waiting for his monthly Autosport magazine articles to appear, he’s started ruminating of F1’s long range future without the benefit of his debut in a slick paper magazine.
Although the brand new 2.4 litre V8 formula is yet to even debut at a grand prix, FIA president Max Mosley revealed that the Federation was - for 2011 - thinking about no longer mandating the number of cylinders or engine capacity.
Instead, one of the only limits on engine design would be the amount of fuel allowed per race.
“All kinds of motors will be allowed,” Max was quoted as saying by the Italian ‘La Gazzetta dello Sport’ newspaper, “but every car will get an equal amount of fuel.”
“So it will be based on (fuel) consumption. Who wins will be the one who uses (the fuel) best.”
Mosley admitted that his idea also tips its hat to the world’s ‘oil crisis’ and to critics of the excesses and waste of futile motor racing.
He said: “It is something that we will talk about at greater length on a later date.”
As much as I dislike Mad Max this idea isn’t as hair-brained as it first appears. With no limits on engine design except making it travel X amount in distance on X amount of fuel opens the field for anything. From the number of cylinders, to potential turbine power, and various types of fuel to be used all becomes possible to the designers.
With the current rush to market of hybrid vehicles for road usage by all the major manufacturers it potentially could offer them an enticement to enter F1 as a proving ground for new technology. We’ll see if Max’s idea ever comes to fruition.
But as my title suggests I’m way ahead of the curve, and plan on beating Mad Max’s little plan. A perpetual motion machine doesn’t need “fuel.” All it needs is a “push start” so to speak, and off it goes, enroute to a World’s Championship.
Of course you naysayers out there may think I’m mad as Max. Thoughts of a perpetual motion machine have been around since Leonardo’s time, (da Vinci not that “King of the…” something or other) and all have failed. Jacques Ozanam (1640-1717) was quoted as saying:“…those who search for, or imagine they have found, the perpetual motion, are always men to whom the most certain and invariable truths in mechanics are unknown.”
Ozanam’s quote gives a man pause for thought I will admit, if only for a moment. But I can’t help thinking of Mad Max’s “Centreline Downwash Generating Wingy” thingy when I read it.
Comments
5 Responses to “May I Suggest a Perpetual Motion Machine?”
Got something to say?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Wow Marc, what’s next, a “Mr. Fusion” and a flux capacitor? Max’s idea is crap of the highest order! It will become a fuel mileage race instead of speed. If I want to watch an alternative fuels race I’ll find some other form of racing to watch. They will reduce it from “Formula One” to “Formula None”.
Ya gotta love Max, he’s kind of like that Great Uncle that is pushed into the kids bedroom for the duration of the families Christmas get-togethers.
He has to be there but needs to be hidden from view. The sad thing is Max doesn’t know the way to Bernie’s bedroom.
On second thought…
Max’s presence seems to indicate otherwise.
Great Idea Max. NOT!!
That’s all we need consumption racing! Remember in the early eighties they did this with the turbo’s. How many times did Albereto & Rosberg end up parked on the hard shoulder without any juice in the closing laps.
I’m still convinced Max is sprouting this crap at, Bernie’s behest, to scare the living bejesus out of the manufacturers.
George, I will handle collecting funds for the “Bitch Slap Max Senseless Foundation” in Australia, could you please pass the hat around up there in North America. I say we perform the act at Monaco, down by the harbour at the tunnel exit & then throw his unconscious body under Sato’s car on the warm up lap. That way we will have performed two acts of charity to F1 for the price of one.
The only problem I see in a “Bitch Slap Max Senseless Foundation” is the fact that the man is already senseless. How about a “Bitch Slap Max Mouthless Foundation”?
I would like to revolutionize the F1 circuit, my suggestion in making it more competitive would be to add an extra 3 laps to a race in the case the 2nd place finisher is positioned 2nd in the overall standings. This would make the races much more intersting and exciting, what do you think? Imagine the possibilities!!!